nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 11, v.41 206-210
面向3D目标检测模型的蜕变测试技术研究
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
发布时间: 2025-11-20
出版时间: 2025-11-20
移动端阅读
摘要:

3D目标检测是计算机视觉的研究重点。目前,3D目标检测模型的精度不断提升,但模型的鲁棒性较低,存在缺乏测试预言的问题。为了解决测试预言问题,提出面向3D目标检测模型的蜕变测试技术。模拟现实场景中的噪声干扰和雷达校准问题;提出增加噪声、删除部分点、角度畸变和径向缩放4种蜕变关系;构建后续点云生成方法,设计点云的一致性验证方法,以判断原始输出和后续输出是否满足蜕变关系。对3个先进的3D目标检测模型进行实验验证,结果表明,所提出的方法能够检测出大量3D目标检测模型的错误行为,4种蜕变关系识别错误行为的平均错误率分别为18.46%、9.93%、17.10%和18.99%,能够有效地评估模型的鲁棒性。

Abstract:

3D object detection is a key research focus in computer vision.Currently,the accuracy of 3D object detection models is continuously improving,but robustness of the models remains low.There is a lack of testing oracles.To solve the issue of testing oracles,metamorphic testing techniques for 3D object detection model is proposed.Noise interference and radar calibration issues in real-world scenarios are simulated,and four metamorphic relations are proposed,i.e.,adding noise,deleting partial points,angle distortion and radial scaling.A subsequent point cloud generation method is constructed,and a consistency validation method for point clouds is designed to determine whether the original output and subsequent output satisfy the metamorphic relations.Experimental verification is conducted on three advanced 3D object detection models.The results show that the proposed method can detect a large number of erroneous behaviors in 3D object detection models.The average error rates of the four metamorphic relations identifying erroneous behaviors are 18.46%,9.93%,17.10% and 18.99%respectively,which can effectively evaluate the robustness of the models.

参考文献

[1]秦静,王伟滨,邹启杰,等.基于激光雷达点云的3D目标检测方法综述[J].计算机科学,2023,50(S1):259-265.

[2]康晴,汤超,李婧萱,等.基于深度学习的3D目标检测算法研究[J].计算机时代,2022(6):44-48.

[3]王凌,邹昊东,杜元翰,等.基于深度强化学习的自主避障技术研究[J].微型电脑应用,2023,39(5):47-50.

[4]李晓玉,罗扬.蜕变测试概述[J].网络安全技术与应用,2018(11):49-50.

[5] CHEN T Y,CHEUNG S C,YIU S M.Metamorphic Testing:a New Approach for Generating Next Test Cases[Z].arxiv,2020.

[6]张月.数值程序蜕变关系构造及优化研究[D].泉州:华侨大学,2019.

[7]江竞捷.面向图像识别软件的蜕变测试技术研究[D].中国电子科技集团公司电子科学研究院,2021.

[8]屠凯奕.基于蜕变测试的智能问答系统质量评估方法[D].杭州:浙江理工大学,2022.

[9]钟文康,葛季栋,陈翔,等.面向神经机器翻译系统的多粒度蜕变测试[J].软件学报,2021,32(4):1051-1066.

[10]邓鸿博,张海波,左小凯.适用于Fisher分类器的蜕变测试方法[J].计算机与数字工程,2019,47(10):2524-2528.

[11] GEIGER A,LENZ P,URTASUN R.Are We Ready for Autonomous Driving?The KITTI Vision Benchmark Suite[C]//2012IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.June 16-21,2012,Providence,RI,USA.IEEE,2012:3354-3361.

[12] YAN Y,MAO Y X,LI B.SECOND:Sparsely Embedded Convolutional Detection[J].Sensors,2018,18(10):3337.

[13] SHI S S,WANG Z,SHI J P,et al.From Points to Parts:3D Object Detection from Point Cloud with Part-aware and Part-aggregation Network[J].IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,2021,43(8):2647-2664.

[14] SHI S S,GUO C X,JIANG L,et al.PV-RCNN:Pointvoxel Feature Set Abstraction for 3DObject Detection[C]//2020IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition(CVPR).June 13-19,2020.Seattle,WA,USA.IEEE,2020:10526-10535.

[15] ZHOU J Y,QIU K,ZHENG Z,et al.Using Metamorphic Testing to Evaluate DNN Coverage Criteria[C]//2020IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops(ISSREW).October12-15,2020,Coimbra,Portugal.IEEE,2020:147-148.

基本信息:

中图分类号:TP391.41

引用信息:

[1]李承钊,王甜,耿新,等.面向3D目标检测模型的蜕变测试技术研究[J].微型电脑应用,2025,41(11):206-210.

发布时间:

2025-11-20

出版时间:

2025-11-20

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文